As the war in Ukraine drags on and peace talks struggle to gain traction, a report from Bloomberg has reignited debate. According to the agency, Vladimir Putin is reportedly exploring the possibility of using frozen Russian assets in the United States to purchase Boeing aircraft. The idea, though unofficial, is raising questions about a possible behind-the-scenes deal between Moscow and Washington \u2014 one potentially brokered by Donald Trump.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So far, no formal agreement has been confirmed. However, discreet contacts between both parties are believed to have included the possibility of unlocking a portion of Russia\u2019s frozen funds \u2014 estimated at $5 billion in the U.S. and $280 billion globally \u2014 to buy Boeing jets. Officially, Washington maintains that a ceasefire<\/strong> must precede any deal. Yet the specific wording \u2014 \u201cceasefire\u201d rather than \u201cpeace treaty\u201d \u2014 hints at potential diplomatic flexibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For Russia, even a partial unfreezing of assets would provide a much-needed economic boost. The country\u2019s civil aviation sector has been crippled by Western sanctions, particularly the ban on acquiring Boeing and Airbus spare parts. Russian airlines have resorted to cannibalizing grounded planes to keep others flying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the American side, Boeing is also struggling. Plagued by safety scandals and a sharp drop in international orders \u2014 especially from China \u2014 the U.S. manufacturer has a large inventory of undelivered aircraft. A sale to Russia, even via intermediaries, could ease that burden.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Any such arrangement would be fraught with political risk. It could weaken international pressure on Moscow without a comprehensive peace deal in place. Western governments, especially in Europe, currently channel interest earned from frozen Russian assets into Ukraine\u2019s war effort. Touching the principal, however, remains taboo \u2014 both legally and politically \u2014 given the potential implications for global financial stability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If realized, the move could fracture Western unity and raise doubts about the legitimacy of \u201ccommercial diplomacy\u201d as a substitute for a genuine political resolution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some analysts suggest Putin may be using the idea of a Boeing deal to buy time, weaken international cohesion, and inject liquidity into an economy battered by sanctions and falling oil revenues. For Donald Trump \u2014 who has often criticized the cost of U.S. involvement in Ukraine \u2014 the logic may appear straightforward: exchange peace, or at least a ceasefire, for selective sanctions relief<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yet the danger is clear: allowing Moscow to recover assets without firm guarantees could undermine years of diplomatic and military efforts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to U.S. officials, no agreement has been reached<\/strong>. Washington\u2019s stance remains unchanged: no lifting of sanctions without a clear path toward peace<\/strong>. Still, recent statements from the Kremlin citing a \u201cpotential for stabilizing economic cooperation\u201d indicate Moscow is serious about exploring this option.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" As the war in Ukraine drags on and peace talks struggle to gain traction, a report from Bloomberg has reignited debate. According to the agency, Vladimir Putin is reportedly exploring the possibility of using frozen Russian assets in the United States to purchase Boeing aircraft. The idea, though unofficial, is raising questions about a possible […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":527382,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_trash_the_other_posts":false,"editor_notices":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"pays":[114],"personnalite":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-527381","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-insight","8":"pays-world"},"acf":{"type_de_publication":"Analyse","nom_de_linstitution":"Henri DRUMAUD","description_de_linstitution":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=527381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527381\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/527382"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=527381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=527381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=527381"},{"taxonomy":"pays","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pays?post=527381"},{"taxonomy":"personnalite","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benews.ci\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/personnalite?post=527381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}A diplomatically risky move<\/h3>\n\n\n\n